Technology · checked October 24, 2026
Project management software for tech companies
Project management software for tech companies has to sit between two places a general tool keeps apart: the plan, and the repository where the work actually happens. Most engineering teams already split their day across a tracker and GitHub [5], and half of developers say they lose ten or more hours a week to organisational friction, with context switching between tools near the top of the list [8]. Kavanah is an agentic project management platform that links tasks to pull requests and commits, plans sprints on each person's real estimate-versus-actual history, and lets AI agents do the coordination work inside limits a person wrote. This page covers what to require, how Kavanah answers, and a dated comparison with Jira, Linear, Asana and monday dev.
#Why it is different
The tracker and the code live in different tools, and someone keeps them in sync by hand
In Stack Overflow's 2025 survey, 81.1% of respondents used GitHub and 46.4% used Jira, rising to 52.1% among professional developers [5]. Those are two systems with two copies of the truth about the same work, and the code side moves fast: developers merged an average of 43.2 million pull requests a month on GitHub in 2025 [7]. The same survey found 54% of respondents use six or more tools to do their job [6]. Atlassian's 2025 developer-experience research, covering 3,500 developers and managers, found 50% losing ten or more hours a week to organisational inefficiencies, and named finding information and context switching between tools among the top causes [8]. Its 2024 study put it at 69% losing eight or more hours a week [9].
Estimates are the second gap. A sprint plan is a promise built on numbers, and most tools treat every estimate as if it were equally reliable. DORA's 2024 report found that unstable priorities lower productivity and raise burnout [3]. A plan that is wrong in the same direction every sprint is a steady source of exactly that instability: work spills over, the next sprint is re-cut, and the roadmap moves.
AI has made both problems more urgent rather than less. DORA's 2025 research found 90% of respondents using AI at work and more than 80% reporting higher productivity, but also that AI adoption still has a negative relationship with software delivery stability [1]. Its summary is that AI is an amplifier of an organisation's existing strengths and weaknesses [2]. Developers are cautious: in 2025, 46% actively distrusted the accuracy of AI tools against 33% who trusted it, and only 14.1% used AI agents at work daily [4]. An agent bolted onto a tracker, with no permission model and no record of what it did, amplifies the mess instead of clearing it.
#What to require
What to require from project management software at a tech company
Use this as a buyer's checklist. It is written for software, SaaS and IT teams, and it assumes AI agents will be doing some of the work within a year, since most developers already use AI daily or plan to [4].
01
Tasks that know about the code
A pull request or commit that mentions a task should appear on that task without anyone pasting a link. If the team still tracks bugs in GitHub Issues, the two should stay in sync in both directions, with a guard against the sync echoing itself forever.
02
Sprint plans that learn from actuals
The tool should compare estimates with logged time per person and use the history to say what fits in a sprint with a stated confidence, without overwriting the original estimate. A plan that cannot tell a coin-flip commitment from a safe one is guessing.
03
AI agents with a scope, an approval step and an undo
An agent should see only the projects it is allowed to see, ask before any category of action you choose, record every action it takes, and let a person reverse one. Trust in AI output is low among developers [4], so the controls matter more than the demo.
04
An API, a CLI and an MCP server
Engineers automate. The tool should expose a documented REST API, a command line, and a Model Context Protocol server so AI assistants can work with it directly. MCP is an open standard for connecting AI applications to external systems [11].
05
Follow-ups that survive the meeting
Postmortems only work when their actions are tracked to completion. Google's SRE guidance defines a postmortem as a written record of an incident, its impact, the actions taken, the root causes and the follow-up actions to prevent recurrence, written without blame [10]. The follow-ups belong on the board, owned and dated.
06
Identity and security evidence your customers will ask for
SaaS companies sell into security reviews, so the tools they run on get reviewed too. Expect SAML or OIDC single sign-on, SCIM, multi-factor sign-in and an audit log, and ask exactly where the vendor's SOC 2 stands. SOC 2 reports cover security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy [12].
#How Kavanah does it
How Kavanah runs a technology team's work
Each item below describes the product as it ships today. Where something is opt-in, it is off until a workspace turns it on, because anything that acts on its own or spends AI credits in Kavanah starts disabled.
GitHub-linked tasks
Install the GitHub App and Kavanah syncs repositories, pull requests and commits. A PR or commit that says "fixes #123", "task 123" or "TASK-123" is linked to that task, with its branch, state (draft, in review, merged or closed), commit count and line counts on the record. GitLab repositories can be added too.
Two-way GitHub Issues sync
Turn it on per repository and issue title, body and open or closed state stay in step with the matching task in both directions. A hash of the last agreed state stops the sync from bouncing its own changes back and forth.
Sprints planned at p50 and p90
Kavanah measures each person's actual hours against their estimates over the last 90 days. The sprint planner packs the backlog into capacity at the median and at the 90th percentile, says what got deferred, and never rewrites a stored estimate. Committing the sprint stays a human action.
AI employees with a job description
Hire AI employees with a role, a set of tool scopes and access to the projects you choose. Safe mode removes risky actions entirely; action policies park chosen categories for approval; every action lands in a ledger with undo. The agent cannot grant itself authority.
Learn moreMeetings to tasks
Record a call inside Kavanah and the transcript becomes notes and action items, which turn into tasks. With triage capture on, they arrive as candidates a person accepts or dismisses, so a postmortem's follow-ups do not vanish into a doc.
API, CLI and MCP
A REST API with a published OpenAPI spec, workspace API keys that inherit the minting user's permissions, the kvn command line, and an MCP server so Claude can read and write your workspace as a connector.
Learn moreJira, Asana, ClickUp, monday and Notion alongside
Connect your current tracker and let agents work across it while it stays the system of record. Trello, monday and CSV imports move tasks in when you are ready to switch.
Identity and access controls
SAML 2.0 and OIDC single sign-on and SCIM directory sync on the Enterprise plan, TOTP and passkey multi-factor sign-in, per-project and per-task access control, and an immutable audit log. The SOC 2 Type II observation period is underway; there is no report yet, and we say so.
Learn morePriced per seat, AI metered separately
From $3 a seat a month with unlimited seats and projects. AI usage is metered in credits, so a team pays for the agent work it uses rather than for an AI add-on on every seat.
Learn more#In practice
Four engineering workflows, step by step
Engineering manager and team
Monday sprint planning on calibrated estimates
- Developers log time against tasks during the sprint, as they already do for estimates.
- On Monday the manager asks the agent for a sprint recommendation for two weeks.
- The planner returns what fits at p50 and at p90, per person, with the deferred list.
- The team commits the p90 set in the Sprint Planner and treats the rest as stretch.
- Velocity and the next sprint's calibration update from the actuals automatically.
Developers
Code-linked status without a status meeting
- A developer opens a pull request titled "Fixes #412: retry webhook on 502".
- Kavanah links the PR to task 412, with its branch and state.
- If the repository has Issues sync on, closing the matching GitHub issue closes the task, and the reverse.
- Ask the agent about task 412 and it answers from the linked record: the PR, its state and what changed.
On-call engineer and service owners
Postmortem to owned follow-ups
- After the incident, the team holds the blameless review on a recorded Kavanah call.
- The transcript becomes notes and action items, filed as tasks or as triage candidates.
- The owner accepts each candidate with an assignee and a due date, or dismisses it with a reason.
- The follow-ups sit on the board beside feature work, so a sprint plan has to make room for them.
Engineering lead
An AI employee for triage, in safe mode
- Hire one AI employee with the tasks-and-projects scope and access to the product projects only.
- Leave it in safe mode, so deletes, outside email and other risky tools are not available to it.
- Give it the inbound backlog: estimate each task, suggest an owner, and write the weekly summary.
- Read its action ledger for a week, undo anything wrong, then widen the scope one category at a time.
#Compared
Kavanah, Jira, Linear, Asana and monday dev compared for tech companies
Each competitor cell describes only what that vendor's own public page said when we checked it on October 24, 2026: Jira's product, features, agile and integrations pages and Atlassian's SOC 2 page [13][14][15][16][17], Linear's home, pricing and security pages [18][19][20], Asana's engineering, pricing and trust pages [21][22][23], and monday dev's product and pricing pages [24][25]. "Not described" means the page we checked did not say, not that the product lacks it. Kavanah cells describe the product as it ships.
| Criterion | Kavanah | Jira | Linear | Asana | monday dev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sprint planning | Sprints and velocity; planner forecasts what fits at p50 and p90 from each person's estimate-vs-actual history | Backlog-centred sprint planning; sprints typically one or two weeks [15] | Cycles listed as a feature; sprint planning not described [18] | Sprint planning, roadmaps and bug tracking; agile or scrum [21] | Sprints; scrum, kanban and hybrid agile [24] |
| Git integration | GitHub App: repos, PRs and commits linked to tasks by reference; two-way Issues sync per repo | Source code and pull requests on cards; Bitbucket integration [15][16] | Loops triggered from GitHub; agent work ends in a PR [18] | Links GitHub and GitLab commits, PRs and issues to tasks [21] | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps integrations [24] |
| AI agents and their controls | AI employees with scoped tools and project access; safe mode, approval policies, action ledger and undo | Rovo AI; assign work to coding agents; audit trail for AI usage [13] | Agents as teammates that open PRs; coding sessions use AI credits [18][19] | AI Teammates and AI Studio automations [21] | AI sprint summaries, bug categorisation, agents that complete tasks [24] |
| Bugs and incidents | Bugs and postmortem follow-ups tracked as tasks; no dedicated incident module | Bug work types; incidents not described [14] | Issues from conversations and feedback; incidents not described [18] | Bug tracking and deployment monitoring; incidents not described [21] | Real-time bug and incident reports [24] |
| API and extensibility | REST API with OpenAPI spec, CLI, MCP server for Claude, community-app SDK | Rich APIs, 3,000+ Marketplace integrations, MCP and CLI [13][16] | Linear MCP; developer docs [18] | 260+ integrations; developer API [21] | Not described |
| Security attestations named | SOC 2 Type II observation period underway; no report yet | Independent third-party SOC 2 audits [17] | SOC 2 Type II; ISO/IEC 27001:2022 [20] | SOC 2 Type 2; ISO/IEC 27001:2022, 27017, 27018, 27701 [23] | SOC 2 Type II; ISO/IEC 27001, 27017, 27018 [24] |
| Single sign-on | SAML 2.0 / OIDC SSO and SCIM on Enterprise; TOTP and passkey MFA | SAML and SSO [14] | SAML and SCIM on Enterprise [20] | SSO and SAML 2.0 for Enterprise [23] | Not described |
| Entry paid price | $3 per seat a month; AI metered in credits | Not shown in the page text we could read | $10 per user a month, billed yearly [19] | $10.99 per user a month, billed yearly [22] | $9 per seat a month, billed annually; plans start at 3 seats [25] |
#Questions
Questions buyers ask
- What is the best project management software for tech companies?
- The one that links your tasks to your code, plans on real estimates and lets you control any AI agent it runs. Jira is the most widely used tracker among developers, Linear is popular with product-led startups, and Asana and monday dev cover engineering alongside other teams. Kavanah is built for teams that want AI agents doing the coordination work, with scopes, approvals, an action ledger and undo, on a price of $3 a seat a month.
- Does Kavanah integrate with GitHub?
- Yes. The GitHub App syncs repositories, pull requests and commits, and links each one to a task when its title or message references the task, for example "fixes #123". Two-way GitHub Issues sync is available per repository and is off until you turn it on. GitLab repositories can be added as well.
- Can Kavanah replace Jira?
- It can, but you do not have to switch to start. Kavanah connects to Jira, Asana, ClickUp, monday and Notion, so a team can keep its current tracker as the system of record while Kavanah's agents work across it. Trello, monday and CSV imports move tasks in when you decide to move.
- How does Kavanah plan sprints?
- It compares each person's logged hours with their estimates over the last 90 days, then packs the backlog into the team's capacity twice: at the median, which is a coin flip, and at the 90th percentile, which is a commitment worth making. It reports what fits and what was deferred, and never rewrites the stored estimates. A person commits the sprint.
- Are Kavanah's AI agents safe to use on production work?
- Agents in Kavanah see only the projects they are given, and safe mode removes risky tools such as deletes and outside email entirely. Action policies make any category of action wait for a person's approval, every action is recorded in a ledger, and actions can be undone. An agent cannot grant itself authority. Anything that runs on its own or spends credits is opt-in.
- Does Kavanah have an API?
- Yes. There is a REST API with a published OpenAPI specification, workspace API keys that carry the permissions of the person who created them, the kvn command line, and an MCP server so Claude can use your Kavanah workspace as a connector.
- Is Kavanah SOC 2 certified?
- Not yet. The SOC 2 Type II observation period is underway and there is no report to share today. Kavanah supports SAML 2.0 and OIDC single sign-on and SCIM on the Enterprise plan, TOTP and passkey multi-factor sign-in, per-project and per-task access control and an immutable audit log. The security page describes the controls in detail.
- How much does Kavanah cost for an engineering team?
- Basic is $3 a seat a month and Pro is $6, both with unlimited seats and projects. AI usage is metered in credits, with an allowance included per seat, and there is a flat Scale plan for AI-heavy workspaces. You can start free.
#Go deeper
One question at a time
- IT Project Management Software: Eight Things to Require Before You BuyIT teams buy a project tool and then spend a year working around it. Here are the eight requirements that decide whether it fits: code links, honest estimates, agents with limits, an API, and the security answers your own customers will ask for.
- SaaS Roadmap to Release: Turning Quarterly Bets Into Sprints That Actually ShipA SaaS roadmap is a list of bets. A sprint is a promise. Most teams lose the thread between the two. Here is how to keep the year, the quarter and the sprint connected without re-planning every fortnight.
- Sprint Estimation With p50 and p90: Why Your Commitment Should Be the 90th PercentileAn estimate is a guess with a confidence level nobody writes down. Plan at the median and you miss half your sprints. Here is how p50 and p90 planning works, and why it never touches the original estimate.
- GitHub Issues and Project Tasks: How a Two-Way Sync Avoids the Infinite LoopTwo-way sync sounds simple until the first edit bounces back and forth forever. Here is how to keep GitHub Issues and your project tasks in step, which fields to sync, and which to leave alone.
- Postmortem Follow-Ups That Get Done: Running Action Items as Tracked WorkThe postmortem is written, the meeting ends, and the action items quietly expire in a document. Here is how to turn a blameless review into owned, dated work that competes for sprint capacity in the open.
- AI Agents for Engineering Teams: Driving Your Project Board From the API, the CLI and MCPEngineers do not want another chat window. They want the board inside the tools they already use, and an agent they can script. Here is how the API, the CLI and MCP fit together, and the controls that make it safe.
Related reading
- Agentic project managementThe pillar guide: the autonomy ladder, the six controls, and how to run agents safely.
- How to give an AI agent a task safelyScopes, approvals and the undo button, in the order to set them up.
- The four autonomy levels of an AI project managerWhich engineering work belongs at each level, and when to move it up.
- Security at KavanahSSO, MFA, SCIM, access control, audit logs and where data is processed.
Sources
- [1] Announcing the 2025 DORA Report: State of AI-Assisted Software Development — Google Cloud, 2025
- [2] State of AI-assisted Software Development 2025 — DORA, 2025
- [3] Accelerate State of DevOps Report 2024 — DORA, 2024
- [4] 2025 Stack Overflow Developer Survey: AI — Stack Overflow, 2025
- [5] 2025 Stack Overflow Developer Survey: Technology — Stack Overflow, 2025
- [6] 2025 Stack Overflow Developer Survey: Work — Stack Overflow, 2025
- [7] Octoverse: A new developer joins GitHub every second as AI leads TypeScript to #1 — GitHub, 2025, updated 2026
- [8] Atlassian research: AI adoption is rising, but friction persists — Atlassian, 2025
- [9] New Atlassian research on developer experience highlights a major disconnect between developers and leaders — Atlassian, 2025
- [10] Postmortem Culture: Learning from Failure — Google, Site Reliability Engineering, 2016
- [11] What is the Model Context Protocol (MCP)? — Model Context Protocol, 2026, updated
- [12] System and Organization Controls: SOC Suite of Services — AICPA & CIMA, 2026, updated
- [13] Jira — Atlassian, 2026, updated
- [14] Jira features — Atlassian, 2026, updated
- [15] Jira for agile teams — Atlassian, 2026, updated
- [16] Jira integrations — Atlassian, 2026, updated
- [17] SOC 2 — Atlassian Trust Center, 2026, updated
- [18] Linear — Linear, 2026, updated
- [19] Pricing — Linear, 2026, updated
- [20] Security — Linear, 2026, updated
- [21] Asana for engineering teams — Asana, 2026, updated
- [22] Pricing — Asana, 2026, updated
- [23] Trust — Asana, 2026, updated
- [24] monday dev — monday.com, 2026, updated
- [25] monday dev pricing — monday.com, 2026, updated
Sources and the comparison were checked on October 24, 2026. Product details change; check each vendor's own pages before you decide.
Run it on your own work.
Free to start, priced per seat from $3 a month with AI usage metered in credits.